La naturaleza de las opiniones consultivas en el MERCOSUR. Análisis comparativo con la Unión Europea.

This paper attemps to establish similaritys and differences between advisory opinions under the Mercosur rules and the preliminary rulings of the European Union law. With this aim we make an explanation about the nature and mechanism of both concepts, and then we analyze them comparatively, using re...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Authors: García Martínez, María del Pilar, de la Paz Herrera, María, Olivera, Sabrina Victoria
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad de Buenos Aires (UBA): Facultad de Derecho 2013
Subjects:
Opinión consultiva
cuestión prejudicial
Mercosur
Unión Europea
Advisory opinion
preliminary ruling
European Union
Online Access:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4713197
Source:Revista Electrónica del Instituto de Investigaciones Jurídicas y Sociales Ambrosio Lucas Gioja, ISSN 1851-3069, Vol. 7, Nº. 10, 2013, pags. 71-95
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
La naturaleza de las opiniones consultivas en el MERCOSUR. Análisis comparativo con la Unión Europea.
Summary: This paper attemps to establish similaritys and differences between advisory opinions under the Mercosur rules and the preliminary rulings of the European Union law. With this aim we make an explanation about the nature and mechanism of both concepts, and then we analyze them comparatively, using regulatory standars, doctrine and jurisprudence link to the topic. In conclusion we express that the legal nature of the advisory opinions in Mercosur is different from the preliminary rulings in the European Union: they differ in their compulsory and binding nature for the judges who have asked it. However, both are similar in their objetives: ensuring the unity of law and the uniformity in their interpretation and application.

Similar Items