Las garantías judiciales: Análisis a partir de los estándares de la jurisprudencia de la Corte Interamericana de Derechos Humanos
This article will analyze the guarantees provided in the articles 8 and 25 of the American Convention on Human Rights in the light of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American Court. The right to be heard, the presumption of innocence, the reasonable time judgment, a clear and specific accusation, a n...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Spanish |
| Published: |
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
2012
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4192977 |
| Source: | Revista Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 15, Nº. 30, 2012, pags. 65-79 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| Summary: |
This article will analyze the guarantees provided in the articles 8 and 25 of the American
Convention on Human Rights in the light of the jurisprudence of the Inter-American
Court. The right to be heard, the presumption of innocence, the reasonable time
judgment, a clear and specific accusation, a natural judge, are connotations of the
conventional guarantees provided in the Convention that are projected in endless
concrete applications that the Court has issued through all the cases that she has judged
and that grant them a specific sense. It is concluded that the Inter-American Court of
Human Rights has developed a standardization process regarding the reasonable time
of processes followed in the internal jurisdiction of member countries, avoiding juridical
incertitude and insecurity for the parties and establishing uniformity in the management
of process times of the internal legal codes. |
|---|