Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
The author discusses Hannah Arendt�s interpretation of Karl Marx�s understanding of history, and the meaning of his apparently contradictory thesis of abolition of labour, coupled with his notion that labour is central to the process of humanization. The argument shows that labour is the dominant fo...
Saved in:
| Main Author: | |
|---|---|
| Format: | Article |
| Language: | Portuguese |
| Published: |
Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Filosofia. Universidade Federal Fluminense
2010
|
| Subjects: | |
| Online Access: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4027639 |
| Source: | Passagens, ISSN 1984-2503, Vol. 2, Nº. 5, 2010, pags. 166-179 |
| Tags: |
Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
|
| id |
dialnet-ar-18-ART0000503505
|
|---|---|
| record_format |
dialnet
|
| institution |
Dialnet
|
| collection |
Dialnet AR
|
| source |
Passagens, ISSN 1984-2503, Vol. 2, Nº. 5, 2010, pags. 166-179
|
| language |
Portuguese
|
| topic |
marxismo
história trabalho sociabilidade tempo livre marxismo historia trabajo sociabilidad tiempo libre Marxism history labour sociability free time marxisme histoire travail sociabilité temps libre |
| spellingShingle |
marxismo
história trabalho sociabilidade tempo livre marxismo historia trabajo sociabilidad tiempo libre Marxism history labour sociability free time marxisme histoire travail sociabilité temps libre Menegat, Marildo Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio |
| description |
The author discusses Hannah Arendt�s interpretation of Karl Marx�s understanding of
history, and the meaning of his apparently contradictory thesis of abolition of labour,
coupled with his notion that labour is central to the process of humanization. The argument
shows that labour is the dominant form of socialization in bourgeois society, but not in
other social formations that may overcome it. It cannot be said, either, that Marx was
oblivious to the possibility of individual realization through activities other than labour, as
witnessed by his concept of �rich individuality�. Agreeing with Arendt, the author argues
that in the experience of the 20th century, the logical realization of society caused
humanity�s destructive aspects to outdo those that might contribute to the creation of the
rich individuality.
|
| format |
Article
|
| author |
Menegat, Marildo
|
| author_facet |
Menegat, Marildo
|
| author_sort |
Menegat, Marildo
|
| title |
Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| title_short |
Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| title_full |
Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| title_fullStr |
Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| title_full_unstemmed |
Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| title_sort |
da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrio
|
| publisher |
Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Filosofia. Universidade Federal Fluminense
|
| publishDate |
2010
|
| url |
https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4027639
|
| _version_ |
1727129372094103552
|
| spelling |
dialnet-ar-18-ART00005035052022-03-11Da imortalidade dos mortais num mundo sombrioMenegat, Marildomarxismohistóriatrabalhosociabilidadetempo livremarxismohistoriatrabajosociabilidadtiempo libreMarxismhistorylaboursociabilityfree timemarxismehistoiretravailsociabilitétemps libreThe author discusses Hannah Arendt�s interpretation of Karl Marx�s understanding of history, and the meaning of his apparently contradictory thesis of abolition of labour, coupled with his notion that labour is central to the process of humanization. The argument shows that labour is the dominant form of socialization in bourgeois society, but not in other social formations that may overcome it. It cannot be said, either, that Marx was oblivious to the possibility of individual realization through activities other than labour, as witnessed by his concept of �rich individuality�. Agreeing with Arendt, the author argues that in the experience of the 20th century, the logical realization of society caused humanity�s destructive aspects to outdo those that might contribute to the creation of the rich individuality.L� auteur débat la lecture faite par Hannah Arendt sur la concéption d�histoire de Karl Marx et la signification de son thése, apparement contradictoire, de l�abolition du travail en même temps qu�il affirme cette activité comme centrale dans le processus d�humanisation. L�argument demontre que le travail est la forme dominante de la sociabilité dans la société bourgeoise, mais pas dans d�autres formes sociales que viennent a la surpasser. En plus, Marx n�a point ignoré la possibilité de la réalisation des individus par le moyen d�autres activités différentes du travail, comme on voit, par exemple, dans sa concéption de « l�individualité riche ». En faveur d�Arendt, l�auteur argumente que dans l�expérience du vingtième siècle, la réalisation logique de cette société a surposé les aspects destructifs de l�homme commun a ceux de la création de l�individualité riche.O autor discute a leitura de Hannah Arendt sobre a concepção de história de Karl Marx e o significado da sua aparentemente contraditória tese da abolição do trabalho ao mesmo tempo em que afirma esta atividade como central no processo de humanização. O argumento demonstra que o trabalho é a forma dominante de sociabilidade da sociedade burguesa, mas não de outras formas sociais que venham a suprimi-la; e tampouco Marx foi alheio à possibilidade da realização dos indivíduos por meio de outras atividades que não o trabalho, como fica exposto, por exemplo, na sua concepção de �individualidade rica�. Em favor de Arendt o autor argumenta que na experiência do séc. XX, a realização da lógica desta sociedade fez sobreporem-se os aspectos autodestrutivos do homem comum aos da criação da individualidade rica.El autor discute la lectura que Hannah Arendt realiza de la concepción de historia de Karl Marx y el significado de su tesis aparentemente contradictoria de la abolición del trabajo al mismo tiempo en que afirma esta actividad como central en el proceso de humanización. El argumento demuestra que el trabajo es la forma dominante de sociabilidad de la sociedad burguesa, pero no de otras formas sociales que la vayan a superar; y que Marx no fue ajeno a la posibilidad de realización de los individuos por medio de otras actividades diferentes del trabajo, como está expuesto, por ejemplo, en su concepción de �individualidad rica�. A favor de Arendt, el autor argumenta que, en la experiencia del siglo XX, la realización de la lógica de esta sociedad sobrepuso los aspectos autodestructivos del hombre común a aquellos de su creación de la individualidad rica.Instituto de Ciências Humanas e Filosofia. Universidade Federal Fluminense2010text (article)application/pdfhttps://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=4027639(Revista) ISSN 1984-2503Passagens, ISSN 1984-2503, Vol. 2, Nº. 5, 2010, pags. 166-179porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: https://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI
|