Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

dialnet-ar-18-ART0000476186

dialnet

Dialnet

Dialnet AR

Cognitio Juris, ISSN 2236-3009, Vol. 2, Nº. 4, 2012, pags. 52-62

Portuguese

ambiente de trabalho
reestruturação produtiva
risco no trabalho
dignidade no trabalho
work environment
productive restructuring
risk at work
dignity at work

ambiente de trabalho
reestruturação produtiva
risco no trabalho
dignidade no trabalho
work environment
productive restructuring
risk at work
dignity at work
de Oliveira, Lourival José
Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

The work environment must be understood as a public good. This understanding derives from a different understanding with regard mainly to their protection. The application of the theory of subjective responsibility, whatever the circumstances, is at odds with the values constitutionally erected. The new business reality, the new management models, the new dynamics imposed in daily work gave rise in worker characteristics, known as a whole as a new subjectivity, mainly marked by exacerbated individualism. At the same time there was a need to understand the risks inherent in this new work environment, which should be measured in order to apprehend them without clear empirical rigor in most cases. That is, for example, causation is no longer necessarily something to be shown, starting from the assumption that the work environment can be understood as a permanent state of risk. The repair of the damage has already occurred in violation of the protections contained in the constitutional text, worth mentioning explicitly Articles 1 and 170 mainly. There was a growing need to develop preventive forms, or instruments that may prevent the outbreak of the damage, considering this procedure as the constitutionally legitimate effectively. The landmarks that define the business risk, the ways of its calculation, the understanding of the protection to be built around the value of human labor must undergo major changes, failing to keep in step with the new business dynamics, consequently bringing irreversible damage to the work environment.The work environment must be understood as a public good. This understanding derives from a different understanding with regard mainly to their protection. The application of the theory of subjective responsibility, whatever the circumstances, is at odds with the values constitutionally erected. The new business reality, the new management models, the new dynamics imposed in daily work gave rise in worker characteristics, known as a whole as a new subjectivity, mainly marked by exacerbated individualism. At the same time there was a need to understand the risks inherent in this new work environment, which should be measured in order to apprehend them without clear empirical rigor in most cases. That is, for example, causation is no longer necessarily something to be shown, starting from the assumption that the work environment can be understood as a permanent state of risk. The repair of the damage has already occurred in violation of the protections contained in the constitutional text, worth mentioning explicitly Articles 1 and 170 mainly. There was a growing need to develop preventive forms, or instruments that may prevent the outbreak of the damage, considering this procedure as the constitutionally legitimate effectively. The landmarks that define the business risk, the ways of its calculation, the understanding of the protection to be built around the value of human labor must undergo major changes, failing to keep in step with the new business dynamics, consequently bringing irreversible damage to the work environment.

Article

de Oliveira, Lourival José

de Oliveira, Lourival José

de Oliveira, Lourival José

Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalho

2012

http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3918125

1709710407265943552

dialnet-ar-18-ART00004761862016-04-13Da proteçao ao ambiente do trabalho: os novos marcos definidores do risco no trabalhode Oliveira, Lourival Joséambiente de trabalhoreestruturação produtivarisco no trabalhodignidade no trabalhowork environmentproductive restructuringrisk at workdignity at workThe work environment must be understood as a public good. This understanding derives from a different understanding with regard mainly to their protection. The application of the theory of subjective responsibility, whatever the circumstances, is at odds with the values constitutionally erected. The new business reality, the new management models, the new dynamics imposed in daily work gave rise in worker characteristics, known as a whole as a new subjectivity, mainly marked by exacerbated individualism. At the same time there was a need to understand the risks inherent in this new work environment, which should be measured in order to apprehend them without clear empirical rigor in most cases. That is, for example, causation is no longer necessarily something to be shown, starting from the assumption that the work environment can be understood as a permanent state of risk. The repair of the damage has already occurred in violation of the protections contained in the constitutional text, worth mentioning explicitly Articles 1 and 170 mainly. There was a growing need to develop preventive forms, or instruments that may prevent the outbreak of the damage, considering this procedure as the constitutionally legitimate effectively. The landmarks that define the business risk, the ways of its calculation, the understanding of the protection to be built around the value of human labor must undergo major changes, failing to keep in step with the new business dynamics, consequently bringing irreversible damage to the work environment.The work environment must be understood as a public good. This understanding derives from a different understanding with regard mainly to their protection. The application of the theory of subjective responsibility, whatever the circumstances, is at odds with the values constitutionally erected. The new business reality, the new management models, the new dynamics imposed in daily work gave rise in worker characteristics, known as a whole as a new subjectivity, mainly marked by exacerbated individualism. At the same time there was a need to understand the risks inherent in this new work environment, which should be measured in order to apprehend them without clear empirical rigor in most cases. That is, for example, causation is no longer necessarily something to be shown, starting from the assumption that the work environment can be understood as a permanent state of risk. The repair of the damage has already occurred in violation of the protections contained in the constitutional text, worth mentioning explicitly Articles 1 and 170 mainly. There was a growing need to develop preventive forms, or instruments that may prevent the outbreak of the damage, considering this procedure as the constitutionally legitimate effectively. The landmarks that define the business risk, the ways of its calculation, the understanding of the protection to be built around the value of human labor must undergo major changes, failing to keep in step with the new business dynamics, consequently bringing irreversible damage to the work environment.O meio ambiente do trabalho deve ser entendido como um bem público. Deste entendimento deriva uma compreensão diferente no que se refere principalmente à sua proteção. A aplicação da teoria da responsabilidade subjetiva, seja qual for a hipótese, encontra-se em descompasso com os valores erigidos constitucionalmente. A nova realidade empresarial, os novos modelos gerenciais, a nova dinâmica imposta no cotidiano do trabalho fez nascer características próprias no trabalhador, conhecidas no seu conjunto como sendo um novo subjetivismo, marcado pelo individualismo exacerbado principalmente. No mesmo passo surgiu a necessidade de compreender os riscos inerentes a este novo ambiente de trabalho, os quais devem ser mensurados de maneira a apreendê-los sem o rigorismo empírico manifesto na maioria das hipóteses. Ou seja, por exemplo, nexo de causalidade deixou de ser algo a ser necessariamente demonstrado, partindo-se do pressuposto que o ambiente de trabalho pode ser compreendido como um estado permanente de risco. A reparação do dano já ocorrido vem em desacordo com as proteções contidas no texto constitucional, valendo citar de forma expressa os artigos 1º e 170 principalmente. Nasce a necessidade de desenvolver as formas preventivas, ou seja, instrumentos que possam evitar a eclosão do dano, considerando este procedimento como o efetivamente legitimado constitucionalmente. Os marcos definidores do risco empresarial, as formas de sua apuração, o entendimento sobre a proteção a ser construída em torno do valor trabalho humano precisam sofrer grandes mudanças, sob pena de continuar em descompasso com a nova dinâmica empresarial, trazendo por conseqüência prejuízos irreversíveis ao ambiente do trabalho.2012text (article)application/pdfhttp://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3918125(Revista) ISSN 2236-3009Cognitio Juris, ISSN 2236-3009, Vol. 2, Nº. 4, 2012, pags. 52-62porLICENCIA DE USO: Los documentos a texto completo incluidos en Dialnet son de acceso libre y propiedad de sus autores y/o editores. Por tanto, cualquier acto de reproducción, distribución, comunicación pública y/o transformación total o parcial requiere el consentimiento expreso y escrito de aquéllos. Cualquier enlace al texto completo de estos documentos deberá hacerse a través de la URL oficial de éstos en Dialnet. Más información: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI | INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS STATEMENT: Full text documents hosted by Dialnet are protected by copyright and/or related rights. This digital object is accessible without charge, but its use is subject to the licensing conditions set by its authors or editors. Unless expressly stated otherwise in the licensing conditions, you are free to linking, browsing, printing and making a copy for your own personal purposes. All other acts of reproduction and communication to the public are subject to the licensing conditions expressed by editors and authors and require consent from them. Any link to this document should be made using its official URL in Dialnet. More info: http://dialnet.unirioja.es/info/derechosOAI