Aportes del derecho comparado a los sistemas alternativos de resolución de amparos del derecho de acceso a la información en Chile
One of the challenges of the Council for Transparency (CT) consists in solving over a short period of time the citizens� complaints on freedom of information. This research explains how similar institutions use alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (ADR) to conclude the less complex cases over a...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
Universidad Viña del Mar
2011
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3869170 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista de Derechos Fundamentales, ISSN 0719-1669, Nº. 5, 2011, pags. 81-128 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
One of the challenges of the Council for Transparency (CT) consists in solving over a short
period of time the citizens� complaints on freedom of information. This research explains how
similar institutions use alternative dispute resolution mechanisms (ADR) to conclude the less
complex cases over a shorter period of time. In this context, it analyses the American, Australian,
British, Canadian, and Irish experiences in the subject. It proposes that institutionalizing and
consolidating, within the Council for Transparency, the exploration of agreements between parties
by ADR, not only contributes to decongest the workload but also strengthens the efficacy of the
right of freedom of information. |
|---|