Control constitucional abstracto, concreto, maximalista y minimalista
The Colombian Constitutional Court is charge of reviewing the integrity and supremacy of the constitution through two institutional powers: to review laws and constitutional reform acts and to review the judgment related to the constitutional actions (tutelage of rights). Traditionally, the scholars...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
Universidad Militar Nueva Granada
2011
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | https://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3699233 |
| Baliabidea: | Revista Prolegómenos. Derechos y Valores de la Facultad de Derecho, ISSN 0121-182X, Vol. 14, Nº. 27, 2011, pags. 165-180 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The Colombian Constitutional Court is charge of reviewing the integrity and supremacy
of the constitution through two institutional powers: to review laws and constitutional
reform acts and to review the judgment related to the constitutional actions (tutelage
of rights). Traditionally, the scholars define the first institutional power like an abstract
judicial review and the second like a concrete judicial review. This definition is wrong
if the relevant criteria are the normative nature in the abstract review and the existence
of a case in the concrete review. The deficiencies in typifications of the constitutional
control impact on conceptions of judicial precedent and leave without support the thesis
according to which the judicial precedents in the abstract review judgment should be
maximalist and the concrete review judgment should be minimalist. |
|---|