Justicia correctiva vs. justicia social en casos de conflicto armado

How do we justify the practice of corrective justice for losses suffered during armed conflicts? This article seeks to show the force and relevance of this question, and to argue that, in cases of massively destructive wars, social justice should gain priority over corrective justice. Starting from...

Full description

Saved in:
Bibliographic Details
Main Author: Kalmanovitz, Pablo
Format: Article
Language:Spanish
Published: Universidad del Rosario 2010
Subjects:
reparación
justicia social
conflicto armado
post-conflicto
justicia transicional
reparation
social justice
armed conflict
post-conflict
transitional justice
reparação
a justiça social
conflitos armados
de pós-conflito
a justiça transicional
Online Access:http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3369101
Source:Revista Estudios Socio-Jurídicos, ISSN 0124-0579, Vol. 12, Nº. 2, 2010, pags. 59-85
Tags: Add Tag
No Tags: Be the first to tag this record
Justicia correctiva vs. justicia social en casos de conflicto armado
Summary: How do we justify the practice of corrective justice for losses suffered during armed conflicts? This article seeks to show the force and relevance of this question, and to argue that, in cases of massively destructive wars, social justice should gain priority over corrective justice. Starting from a liberal Rawlsian conception of the relationship between corrective and social justice, it is argued that, paradoxically, the more destructive a war is, the less normative force corrective rights have and the higher priority policies of social justice, which guarantee basic rights to all citizens, should have.

Similar Items