Sentencia de la Corte Suprema sobre responsabilidad del proveedor por robos en estacionamientos de locales comerciales
The authoress realizes a critical analysis about a Supreme Court sentence dated 2008, in relation to the responsibility of the supplier in case of thefts in their parking lots, since she holds that to demand the existence of a contract to make the article 23 of the Consumer Protection Law applicable...
Gorde:
| Egile nagusia: | |
|---|---|
| Formatua: | Artikulua |
| Hizkuntza: | Gaztelania |
| Argitaratua: |
Universidad Bernardo O'Higgins
2010
|
| Gaiak: | |
| Sarrera elektronikoa: | http://dialnet.unirioja.es/servlet/oaiart?codigo=3262961 |
| Baliabidea: | Ars Boni et Aequi, ISSN 0719-2568, null 6, Nº. 2, 2010, pags. 305-318 |
| Etiketak: |
Etiketa erantsi
Etiketarik gabe: Izan zaitez lehena erregistro honi etiketa jartzen
|
| Laburpena: |
The authoress realizes a critical analysis about a
Supreme Court sentence dated 2008, in relation to the responsibility of the supplier in case of thefts in their parking lots, since she holds
that to demand the existence of a contract to make the article 23 of
the Consumer Protection Law applicable would imply demanding
a requirement that the legislator does not demand. She thinks that
the protection to the consumer proceeds not only if a relation of
consumption exists, but also it can stem from a legal obligation. In
addition, she considers, that the grant of free parking on the part of
a supplier constitutes a service dependent on a principal contract,
in case there exists one between the parts. |
|---|